This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] about bind_pirq

To: 余上 <yusunn@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] about bind_pirq
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:44:47 +0000
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:43:58 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <298d852f0802260013l1b1c0774u14393136e2d10fe9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Ach4U9dPFgt+nORHEdyYHAAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] about bind_pirq
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
Yes, there is a default binding semantics for binding an event channel,
which has to be overridden with bind_vcpu if you want a different binding.

 -- Keir

On 26/2/08 08:13, "余上" <yusunn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I find this hypercall lacks a convenient parameter to set the binding
> vcpu , so , it seems there need another call to bind_vcpu . Is this
> the intended functionality ?
> Best regards
> yushang
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>