This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] building xen without mercury repository access

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] building xen without mercury repository access
From: Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:43:42 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:44:12 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <18353.29868.445494.691248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47B0CCFB.30709@xxxxxxxx> <C3D68652.13C39%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <18353.29868.445494.691248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20080211)
Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] building xen without mercury repository 
> access"):
>> On 11/2/08 22:32, "Guillaume Rousse" <Guillaume.Rousse@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Anyway, using pristine kernel source tarball is not enough. How can I
>>> fetch just the xen dom0 patchset against it ? cloning the whole
>>> linux-2.6.18-xen.hg repository is a bit overkill for me (beside the
>>> additional constraints of preventing network access during build).
>> We should probably stick a tarball of our Linux tree on www.xen.org.
> Yes.  But which version of our hg tree ?  There aren't any release
> tags and a nightly tarball from tip would look scary even if it's
> actually quite stable.
I don't really care, as long as it is properly identified. Keir
suggested revision 406, it's OK for me (I don't track internal changes,
I'm not a kernel hacker).
Of course, if you could have releases, it would be better :)
Guillaume Rousse
Moyens Informatiques - INRIA Futurs
Tel: 01 69 35 69 62

Xen-devel mailing list