|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Migration failed due to "No extended context"
We have seen migration occasionally failing (occasionally meaning there
have been hundreds of successful migrations before the failure) on an
automated test that just cycles virtual machines amongst a set of
physical servers in the presence of network traffic to/from the
guests.
/var/log/xen/xend.log shows this:
[2008-02-07 13:30:40 5149] INFO (XendCheckpoint:365) ERROR Internal
error: No
extended context for VCPU0
[2008-02-07 13:30:40 5149] INFO (XendCheckpoint:365) Save exit rc=1
[2008-02-07 13:30:40 5149] ERROR (XendCheckpoint:141) Save failed on
domain
lynx01-v1 (80).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py",
line 109, in save
forkHelper(cmd, fd, saveInputHandler, False)
File
"xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py",
line 353, in forkHelper
raise XendError("%s failed" % string.join(cmd))
XendError: /usr/lib/xen/bin/xc_save 24 80 0 0 1 failed
The error seems to stem from tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c, which in turn
is due to an error in xen/arch/x86/domctl.c's handling of
XEN_DOMCTL_get_ext_vcpucontext, although I have tracked down which bit
of that is returning an error.
There is a corresponding error when the domain tries to resume after the
failed suspend, again reporting that there is no extended context.
I wondered if it could be related to this:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00814.html
The patch supplied in that report doesn't seem to have been applied.
This is based on a recent checkout of xen-unstable.hg
Kieran
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Migration failed due to "No extended context",
Kieran Mansley <=
|
|
|
|
|