This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] Bug in Linux dom0 netback?

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Bug in Linux dom0 netback?
From: "Joakim Dahlstedt" <jda@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:20:57 -0000
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:22:26 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3CDE4FD.1BDF1%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <0A0354E688485F4F997AA71F4A3343E4028522F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C3CDE4FD.1BDF1%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Achn3MtTOyJvbQxKRv2tKmJV3hAL1AAAZb+2AAAeKMA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Bug in Linux dom0 netback?
> Yes, that's a bug. It would only trigger with old domUs which have a
>netfront driver that does not have the new 'copying receiver' support.
>was introduced by c/s 393 a couple of weeks ago.

That reminds me of another question - Maybe I have missed the discussion
on this e-mail list, but in the netback code I have found the following

         * We don't support rx-flip path (except old guests who don't
         * grok this feature flag).

I am a little bit confused by that comment - I think it means we would
prefer not to use rx-flip but we have to anyhow for guests that don't
understand the rx-flip-feature. Is that correct? Or does it mean
something else?
Is there some sort of plan to long-term completely remove rx-flip from
netback then?

/Joakim Dahlstedt

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain 
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated 
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally 
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received 
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete 

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>