| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Provide 3 times continously writes check and unsha
We have tried 4 other than 3 before just for Kernel build test, and we just
noticed it will not improve the kernel build for ia32e guest so much. But at
that time we didn't test for other benchmark. So we will have another try to
see whether high numbers will be helpful. Thanks.
Thanks
Xiaohui
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Deegan [mailto:Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2008年1月28日 17:49
>To: Xin, Xiaohui
>Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Provide 3 times continously writes check and
>unshadow the guest page
>
>Hi,
>
>At 09:49 +0000 on 24 Jan (1201168161), Tim Deegan wrote:
>> The measurements you gave look like it fixes
>> one particularly bad case very well, but makes overall performance
>> worse. In that case, I'm wondering whether there might be a better way
>> of fixing the network-buffer issue without degrading general
>> performance.
>
>What's the trade-off if you use numbers other than three in this
>heuristic? Does a higher number still detetct data pages without
>harming the general performance so much?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Tim.
>
>--
>Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd.
>[Company #02300071, SL9 0DZ, UK.]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home