WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Make memory hole for PCI Express bigger and prev

To: David Stone <unclestoner@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Make memory hole for PCI Express bigger and prevent roll-over
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:07:22 +0000
Cc: Xen Developers <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:07:51 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3BA63D7.1B2F4%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AchcPjxVetW/SsgxEdyNvQAX8io7RQAARZYE
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Make memory hole for PCI Express bigger and prevent roll-over
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618


On 21/1/08 14:59, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Also should the hole used by the Xen HVM BIOS be limited to
>> 0xF0000000-0xF4FFFFFF rather than 0xF00000000-0xFFFFFFFF?  Because:
>>   - The current DSDT specifies 0xF0000000-0xF4FFFFFF.
> 
> I think this is because it was "big enough" for the Intel engineer who first
> did the Xen ACPI work. There's no reason not to go up to, say, FC000000. We
> can't go all the way to 4GB because there a couple of things up there (at
> least LAPIC and IOAPIC mappings).

Actually, if we do this, will 192MB be enough to be getting along with
anyway, for any devices anyone is currently testing with pass-thru?

Adding the roll-over check is obviously a good idea anyway.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel