WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Cannot boot xen DomU > 2.6.23.1

xming wrote:
OK, I misunderstood your original report to mean that something was
complaining about "too much" output.  You're saying that lots of console
output seems to lock the domain.

Sorry about that, and yes that is the case.

I've had a report about heavy disk IO seems to lock up as well.  Perhaps
they're both related to high event rates.  Do you think you could try an
IO-intensive workload to see if you can get a similar lockup?

IO-intensive locks up too (see below)

When the domain is locked up, what does /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx say?

see below

Hm.  Rather than backing out the structure-change patch, could you try
this workaround:

diff -r be3ca4e0e19e arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c  Thu Jan 17 14:25:07 2008 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c  Thu Jan 17 16:37:42 2008 -0800
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_in
  *
  * 0: not available, 1: available
  */
-static int have_vcpu_info_placement = 1;
+static int have_vcpu_info_placement = 0;

 static void __init xen_vcpu_setup(int cpu)
 {

First of all this patch solves the lock-ups, it works as advertised :)

OK, good. I guess events are getting lost somewhere with vcpu_info placement.

# /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx 113

Would it be possible to map the eip and some top parts of the stack back to kernel symbols? Seems to be the same place in both traces, which is interesting.

eip: c037c0c7
esp: c0343f90
eax: 00000000   ebx: 00000001   ecx: 00000000   edx: c0342000
esi: c0373004   edi: c1210df4   ebp: 00001b7d
 cs: 00000061    ds: 0000007b    fs: 000000d8    gs: 00000000

Stack:
 c0100add c0378980 c0101962 c0104821 c120a000 c0378df4 c0348cff 00000025
 c0348430 00000004 00009000 00006df4 00ea1000 c0363be0 c0343fe8 c03dd007
 00000000 c0343fec c0349868 c0343fe0 178bc1f1 00002001 00020800 00060fb1
 00000000 c03dd000 00000000 00000000

Code:
cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc b8 06 00 00 00 cd 82 <c3> cc
cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc

Call Trace:
  [<c037c0c7>]  <--
  [<c0100add>]
  [<c0378980>]
  [<c0101962>]
  [<c0104821>]
  [<c120a000>]
  [<c0378df4>]
  [<c0348cff>]
  [<c0348430>]
  [<c0363be0>]
  [<c0343fe8>]
  [<c03dd007>]
  [<c0343fec>]
  [<c0349868>]
  [<c0343fe0>]
  [<178bc1f1>]
  [<c03dd000>]

Scenario 2 (have_vcpu_info_placement = 0)
--------------------------------------------------------------

test1: no crash
test2: no crash, but occationally I still get funny output like this

00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
0000AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
000AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
000AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ
00AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZ

Hm, I guess some of the output is getting dropped. Does this happen with 2.6.18-xen?

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel