Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [QEMU-DM] Upgrade emulated UART to 16550

To:	"Alan Cox" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [QEMU-DM] Upgrade emulated UART to 16550A.
From:	"Trolle Selander" <trolle.selander@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 19:06:59 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:07:37 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Umfl+76oliFZnxLJWm05JvXODd83XBqCY7LR7WllEfQ=; b=QQvYTaDMcNtZw4GQAdroalKV2T/V0+HwwjPa3M4vFT4ik8nYIaK9JQRs2lE6CtNX5kvovfOZaERvTVhUgEqzExFQr0V3Kv0BsRKKBba55FMiiMfwetD2t3Y7wKHHLzTkzdmL5rUBhsog5YCwy5jwSRKJM0ROcc+/KJBbbecIdmw=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oIYJLmx6+i5Qn5AJg0Tuy2xUqFvCNIHVfnwwP5NQyhPQZNWJK3b3BSIFiNrXVSbKEk0zECpd+FP92IElvCEp2fzN2y6Fpen0zN++Cf4cDGdZPn/Ob4ni7ZqaHfHU4mqdBgF8GNsMP4bb/OG+z8+4AHn17SPBPls+A6lxYG61H2U=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20071204164819.43c54340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<515922b50712040832ifc112b1j52e1d2390d7c7459@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071204164819.43c54340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, I do mean 16550A-or-later. The code comments make this clear even if my patch name and slightly rushed patched description didn't. The hardware document I used was actually for a 16550D, but I believe there's no difference on the programming/behavior level.

On Dec 4, 2007 5:48 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:32:39 +0100
"Trolle Selander" <trolle.selander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch adds 16550 emulation to qemu-dm. I still consider it a work in

I hope you mean 16550A, 16550 was a faulty part which lost bits and was
withdrawn. The 16550A is subtly different.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [QEMU-DM] Upgrade emulated UART to 16550A.