 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] alloc_vm_area() calling vmalloc_sync_all()
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] alloc_vm_area() calling vmalloc_sync_all() |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:39:29 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there a specific reason for this? Other VM area functions don't do this pro-actively, and native only needs this for allowing NMI and MCE notifiers access to vmalloc space (which is being taken care of when registering such handlers). Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] first binary release of GPL Windows PV drivers, Tomasz Chmielewski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] 15142:78389dbb08bb and domain state, John Levon |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] shared memory and event channel, Amit Singh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] alloc_vm_area() calling vmalloc_sync_all(), Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
