Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix stdvga performance for 32bit ops

To:	Ben Guthro <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix stdvga performance for 32bit ops
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:59:04 +0000
Cc:	Robert Phillips <rphillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:54:27 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4728E583.4040304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcgcCUBaftuvPof8EdyjmQAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix stdvga performance for 32bit ops
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

511 entries? 511*8 + 8 bytes for the read/write pointers == 4096?

-- Keir

On 31/10/07 20:28, "Ben Guthro" <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Corrected a bug in the stdvga code where it did not
properly handle 32 bit operations.
The buf_ioreq_t can now store 32 bits of data.
Because this increases its size to 8 bytes,
only 510 elements fit in the buffered_iopage
(down from 672 elements).

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix stdvga performance for 32bit ops