 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] unregister_xenbus_watch() handling of xenwatch_mutex
Keir Fraser wrote:
> That's a question for Jeremy. I think the 2.6.18 version is equally correct
> and only needs one if statement. Maybe hoisting the lock acquisition gave
> Jeremy a warmer fuzzy feeling? :-)
>
I don't remember changing this specifically. It might have been in
response to a review comment, or maybe xen-unstable changed since I
grabbed the code...
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Double mapping of iomem assertion, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] using 3.1.1 with 256GB host, 11_create_concurrent_pos of xm-test fails with Cannotallocate memory, Krysan, Susan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] unregister_xenbus_watch() handling of xenwatch_mutex, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] c/s 15147 change to struct vcpu_register_vcpu_info, Jan Beulich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
