WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Network performance in Xen 3.0.3

To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Network performance in Xen 3.0.3
From: "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:01:23 +0530
Cc: 阿淳 <m9429015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:32:05 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=eUQbRkq6xtC/6eHlqqQXZIWx/CGHD2z8aig+4h6c7ro=; b=lOZiPpNXdETG3gnabcWWV8OYGlFYMDLAIS+/I+R7qdT//4Y/88NhkENta3cJh7teWbi3VwEDsz6RcYU95a809BxBcqURl5BjeOuRsUj2q8Wi5+wY5mtFTSws00J15SgWx/fzjCzQJe1ukBUVTkpJZHQCXop4/+9kfvbk5pq/8ao=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gAkcSNIy3yJPY/Vh4Bt6OJA0cfXFMjUU1G4/6xMeLgnpY2OjJ1+wojz6vTbHlKjptLGmIzUOOBiSZmjkM/a1qT7A2igFA3eTbFgwbo8KTFTB0C1WuP/SYXpvJN+ZEoNs824YnsrzeZeNdcJ/JNdpFB5nRkHiwWLXCGiC/zQp4cc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071010010622.GA25657@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <000601c806fc$25072690$2c6519a3@mychat7a157898> <20071009033517.GA15753@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bc632150710091104h7b98bf6ene8dce5c3da9bfe8a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071010010622.GA25657@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 10/10/07, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:34:09PM +0530, pradeep singh rautela wrote:
> >
> > http://www.cse.psu.edu/~bhuvan/teaching/spring06/papers/xen-net-opt.pdf
>
> Seems to be based on Xen 2.0, right?

Yes, i missed that part earlier i guess.

> In that case my original comment applies.
>
> > > If it's talking about Xen 3.0.2 or earlier then the problem is
> > > already solved as 3.0.3 and later versions use TSO between domU
> > > an dom0 to drastically reduce the cost of virtualisation.
>
> > Herbert, can you let us know how does domU network performance fares
> > with the native stack performance w.r.t PV and HVM guests both.
> > Couldn't find some concrete information on these number sadly.
>
> Pure HVM drivers are still as bad as they ever were.  However,
> PV-on-HVM drivers lets you get similar performance to PV drivers
> in an HVM domain.

Thanks for the info Herbet.

Cheers,
--
pradeep singh rautela

"question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;"
                -- Wm. Shakespeare

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>