RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3

>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2007年9月7日 18:22
>
>Applied. It looks like Xen's XENPF_enter_acpi_sleep command only
>gets
>invoked after the second write to the pm1a/pm1b control ports. So do we
>actually need first-write handling in that hypercall? Is it going to be used
>in future?
>
> -- Keir

Don't need actually. I'll make a patch later.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3, Tian, Kevin Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3, Keir Fraser RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3, Tian, Kevin <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] LVM/DRBD8/Xen - issue(s) in block-IO implementation?, Peter Siering

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix one dead loop case in host S3, Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Question: xm reboot and waitForDevices, Masaki Kanno

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]