Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Xen 3.1.1

To:	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Xen 3.1.1
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:12:58 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:33:24 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070903191808.GC22983@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcfuwwVmQ8NKp1q2EdyZxQAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] RFC: Xen 3.1.1
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

On 3/9/07 20:18, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd like to get the PVFB changes to replace libvncserver with QEMU into the
> release. I'll post updated patches ASAP.
> 
> I recently managed to get support for TLS + x509 certificate authentication
> merged into upstream QEMU for the VNC server so we have some serious quality
> security there. The back-port to QEMU 0.9.0 in Xen should be fairly easy for
> me to do, so I'll hopefully be able submit that in the next week too.

Does backporting these to 3.1 make sense given that it uses qemu 0.8.2?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Xen 3.1.1