WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: 0/10: Merge xenfb & xenconsoled into qemu-dm
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:49:39 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:50:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C2E9BB90.CABA%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070815200056.GE22579@xxxxxxxxxx> <C2E9BB90.CABA%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:30:08AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 15/8/07 21:00, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The only feature this re-factoring looses is the ability to have the 
> > paravirt
> > text console persistently logged to a file. QEMU allows us to specify that
> > a character device is either sent to a PTY, or a file, but not both at the
> > same time. I'm thinking about ways in which QEMU's character device config
> > syntax & drivers may be extended to allow use of a PTY & File concurrently.
> > 
> > The patches should be applied in order - after each individual patch you
> > should still have a fully operational system for both FV & PV.
> 
> Have you tested both HVM and PV guests with save/restore, migration, and
> *failed* save/restore (e.g., by forcing an error in xc_domain_save.c)? The
> last needs care because qemu-dm must be kept around until the last moment,
> in case the save or migration fails.

I've not tested failed save/restore or migration - just normal save/restore
for FV & PV. I'll do some further testing of the scenarios you suggest. I
don't think I should have broken anything in qemu-dm for HVM because in the
HVM codepaths I merely moved code from one file to another. 

> Are these patches intended to be applied now, or are they RFC?

They could be applied now, but was expecting people might have some feedback
/recommendations for changes - Christian normally has lots of good comments
for QEMU related stuff. So if I have to do another revision of the patches 
I'm fine with it.

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>