|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] xenoprof support patch issue for oprofile 0.9.3
Will,
Thanks for pointing this out.
I will work on a patch to fix this
By the way, it would be nice to have the xenoprof patches merged into
Oprofile CVS tree.
John Levon is not happy with the way passive domain samples are stored
now and I don't have the bandwidth (and knowdledge of user level
Oprofile code) to do the right fixes. This has prevented the patches to
be merged. It would be nice if we can find a volunteer to do the right
fixes and have the code merged. I would be happy to assist anyone who
volunteers for the task. What we need is a way of separating samples
from different domains and change to the tools to understand this new
information.
Thanks
Renato
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> William Cohen
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:47 AM
>> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] xenoprof support patch issue for oprofile 0.9.3
>>
>> Oprofile 0.9.3 released yesterday. The patches for xenoprof
>> are not currently in the upstream oprofile. I noticed that
>> one of the defines in the xenoprof patches for oprofile has
>> a define DOMAIN_SWITCH_CODE in daemon/opd_interface.h which
>> conflicts with SPU_PROFILING_CODE. This conflict will need
>> to be worked out.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Will
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|