|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] arch_init_memory() change
The code in arch/x86/setup.c with comment "Ensure all E820 RAM regions are
page-aligned and -sized" is supposed to fix this. In this case it should
turn the E820 entry into a zero-sized entry that is then discarded when the
e820 map is sanitized. Are you running a version of Xen that's missing this
code?
-- Keir
On 22/6/07 17:28, "Altobelli, David" <david.altobelli@xxxxxx> wrote:
> In xen/arch/x86/mm.c, arch_init_memory() does not follow the same logic
> as find_max_pfn(). If a 4k non page aligned E820_RAM entry exists as
> the last RAM entry in the e820 map, it will be skipped by
> find_max_pfn(), but not by arch_init_memory(), triggering BUG_ON(pfn !=
> max_page).
>
> The logic in arch_init_memory() could be changed to mirror
> find_max_pfn():
> --- xen/arch/x86/mm.c.orig 2007-06-22 10:10:19.000000000 -0500
> +++ xen/arch/x86/mm.c 2007-06-22 10:11:39.000000000 -0500
> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ void arch_init_memory(void)
> /* Every page from cursor to start of next RAM region is I/O.
> */
> rstart_pfn = PFN_UP(e820.map[i].addr);
> rend_pfn = PFN_DOWN(e820.map[i].addr + e820.map[i].size);
> + if (rstart_pfn >= rend_pfn)
> + continue;
> for ( ; pfn < rstart_pfn; pfn++ )
> {
> BUG_ON(!mfn_valid(pfn));
>
> But I think this breaks the sharing logic. It might be better to just
> remove the BUG_ON():
> --- xen/arch/x86/mm.c.orig 2007-06-22 10:10:19.000000000 -0500
> +++ xen/arch/x86/mm.c 2007-06-22 11:20:42.000000000 -0500
> @@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ void arch_init_memory(void)
> /* Skip the RAM region. */
> pfn = rend_pfn;
> }
> - BUG_ON(pfn != max_page);
>
> subarch_init_memory();
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|