|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/12] Pull necessary Linux PM files
Could we not share some of this low-level code across 32 and 64 bits? A good
deal of it must be real mode asm anyway. Also it's weird that only x86/64
gets a new header file.
Overall, I think we should pick the cleanest one (x86/32 or x86/64) as a
starting point and then bludgeon the code so that it works for the other
sub-architecture too. This might involve a new file in the subarch
directories, but only for code that actually really is specific to that
subarch.
Or are there more fundamental differences than it first appears?
Also, I applied two of your patches now, which you will find in the staging
tree (one in xen, one in linux). It would be useful if you would resync the
remainder.
-- Keir
On 15/5/07 15:15, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just borrow 5 files from Linux, for necessary cpu context
> save/restore and wakeup stub. Except them, all the ACPI
> related operations are still carried by dom0.
>
> Signed-off-by Ke Yu <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/12] Pull necessary Linux PM files,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|