Re: [Xen-devel] missed (ortypo) in save/restore

At 15:23 +0800 on 05 Jun (1181057036), Dong, Eddie wrote:
>  
> When save/restore happens at VM_Exit with IDT_vectoring valid,
> pending_valid should be set so that resume path can take correct action.

That should be OK - pending_valid is just semantic sugar for the
INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK bit of the pending_event field, which we've just
checked is set.  We only need to explicitly set it if we're fabricating
the event from scratch (as in the SVM vintr case).

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] about VIRQ & PIRQ, Gautham Kampalapur Shankar, TLS, Chennai [Xen-devel] missed (ortypo) in save/restore, Dong, Eddie Re: [Xen-devel] missed (ortypo) in save/restore, Tim Deegan <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] If we find a Linux repository in $(LINUX_SRC_PATH) then symlink it, Ian Campbell

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] If we find aLinuxrepository in $(LINUX_SRC_PATH) then symlink it, Cui, Dexuan

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] missed (ortypo) in save/restore, Dong, Eddie

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] FW: about VIRQ & PIRQ, Gautham Kampalapur Shankar, TLS, Chennai

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]