|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Comments about Xen 3.1 Kernel
Hi,
the Xen 3.1 release includes patches for 2.6.18, right?
So until now, many users have been complaining about Xen being based on
2.6.16.x. But as far as i could see, 2.6.16.x was still maintained. New
version were released on kernel.org, including new security fixes etc.
Now you guys moved on to 2.6.18. I think, it's even plain 2.6.18 - not
2.6.18.8 (which would be newest from 2.6.18-series).
So 2.6.18 is from September 2006, 2.6.18.8 is from February 2007.
But 2.6.16.52 is from May 30th.
So i understand, that i was time to switch to a new kernel version.
Users complained about missing hardware drivers, for example.
But now - from a security perspective - Xen is based on the unmaintained
2.6.18 series which is a great risk.
That's a strange development.
Why was/is 2.6.16 still maintained? And is there any chance, that 2.6.18
is maintained again (concerning security issues)?
Regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] Comments about Xen 3.1 Kernel,
Sven Köhler <=
|
|
|
|
|