WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performance i

To: "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performance issue
From: "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:07:35 +0800
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:13:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8A87A9A84C201449A0C56B728ACF491E0BA6B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceY9Hl0TwLbUaskRQO2yUxECeuicQATWl7gANAhs0A=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performance issue
We did some regression tests for the performance issue.
And we found that performance issue was introduced by set 15021.
On cset 15020, performance of hvm guest is OK. 

Thanks
Yunfeng

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian Pratt [mailto:Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2007年5月18日 19:46
>To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one
>performanceissue
>
>> 2. Performance of HVM guest downgraded much.
>> Compares with cset 15017, kernel build on HVM against 15072 downgraded
>> about 35%.
>> And even the execution time of our nightly testing has been doubled.
>
>Please can you try and pin down the range of changesets for this
>regression -- there's several possibilities in this range of 55.
>
>Thanks,
>Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>