RE: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1 released!

["Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>]

You can step into the directory docs/, that is in the top directory of Xen 
source code, then "make" for your docs in various formats (i.e., pdf, html, 
ps,tex,...).
You should get be a user manual and development manual.

-- Dexuan

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yuzhong Sun
Sent: 2007年5月22日 12:07
To: 'Tony Breeds'; 'Keir Fraser'
Cc: 'xen-devel'; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 答复: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1 released!

Xen 3.1 announces some new features. Where do I obtain its manual for Xen 3.
1? I visited Xen WIKI including the general version of Xem 3.0 manual.

-Yuzhong

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 代表 Tony Breeds
发送时间: 2007年5月21日 9:27
收件人: Keir Fraser
抄送: xen-devel; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1 released!

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:11:17PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:

> We're pleased to announce the official release of Xen 3.1!

Congratulations!
(I removed xen-announce from the CC as I figured that's not really the
place for this email [and it's probably moderated :)] )

<snip>
 
> You can get the source using mercurial from:
>   http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg
> 
> Source and binary tarballs, and RPMs, are available from:
>   http://www.xensource.com/download/index_oss.html

I realise that releases are relatively rare, and this one is somewhat
special (with the version numbering change), so the process has some
rough edges.

I'd like to make the following observations.
 * Many of the logos on the Xensource site still include the "3.0"
   branding eg.
   http://www.xensource.com/images/products/xen_30_r_logo.gif
 * It's be nice if there was a download tarball link from:
   http://www.xensource.com/download/index_oss.html
   Sure there iare "Mercurial Repository" and "Source Browser" links but
   they're not really the same.  Is it really a requirement to use
   Mercurial to get the code?
 * The Mercurial Repository doesn't contain a tag "3.1.0" or
   "3.1.0-final", and the Mercurial Repository is still called
   3.1-testing.  This makes it a little non-obvious and also if you're
   pointing people at a download page for the latest and greatest it
   doesn't create a sense of confidence :)

It'd be nice to add this little bit of polish if possible.

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au        http://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2008.linux.org.au/
  Jan 28 - Feb 02 2008 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel