|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] NMI deferral on i386
Looking at cloning this logic to more properly support MCE, I see two issues
with this code:
- by using iret, the NMI is being acknowledged to the CPU, and since nothing
was done to address its reason, I can't see why it shouldn't re-trigger right
after that iret (unless it was sent as an IPI)
- by re-issuing it on vector 31, the resulting interrupt will have lower
priority
than any external interrupt, hence all pending interrupts will be serviced
before getting to actually handle the NMI; ideally this should use the highest
possible vector, but since priorities are grouped anyway, at least allocating
the vector from the high priority pool would seem necessary
Thanks, Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] NMI deferral on i386,
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|