Re: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes

To:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:18:22 -0700
Cc:	PUCCETTI Armand <armand.puccetti@xxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:16:59 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C257DEB1.E0F7%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<C257DEB1.E0F7%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)

Keir Fraser wrote:
> __attribute__((regparm(0))) is the default for i386 anyway. Really
> asmlinkage should define to nothing for all x86 architectures, and we can
> just kill off all use of asmlinkage under arch/x86.

We don't use regparm(3) inside Xen?  Works nicely for the kernel.

    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes