WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:56:11 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:55:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C254EEFE.DD0B%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceHJlPukmWRSPMZEduM1gAX8io7RQAAgHKE
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
On 25/4/07 11:41, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attached is my own proposed patch which I think cleans up all the issues.
> Checking just flags in asm and keeping the null-bounce check in
> init_int80_direct_trap() seems fine to me.

The change of a movw $0 to a movb $TBF_EXCEPTION in that patch is wrong, by
the way. Should be movb $0.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel