WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] hvm rombios: Fix int15, fu

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] hvm rombios: Fix int15, func 0x86 (udelay).
From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:19:07 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:18:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200704241116.l3OBGMPh031604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceGYgzVtHEimbjiRzGmk6Ww99B5fAAACvUw
Thread-topic: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] hvm rombios: Fix int15, func 0x86 (udelay).
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-staging-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-staging-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Xen staging patchbot-unstable
> Sent: 24 April 2007 12:16
> To: xen-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] hvm rombios: Fix int15, 
> func 0x86 (udelay).
> 
> # HG changeset patch
> # User kfraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> # Date 1177413238 -3600
> # Node ID f71d167a6c6d7038fedc3d748db334f8ebba6467
> # Parent  a7bd11fd5b1b6f4a82135db09dfe654e8966fabe
> hvm rombios: Fix int15, func 0x86 (udelay).
> Was reading argument from wrong stack location with recent versions of
> bcc. Doing the access from [bp] rather than [sp] is safer as the
> former does not change all the time.
> Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/firmware/rombios/rombios.c |    7 ++-----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -r a7bd11fd5b1b -r f71d167a6c6d tools/firmware/rombios/rombios.c
> --- a/tools/firmware/rombios/rombios.c        Tue Apr 24 
> 12:12:48 2007 +0100
> +++ b/tools/firmware/rombios/rombios.c        Tue Apr 24 
> 12:13:58 2007 +0100
> @@ -4157,15 +4157,12 @@ BX_DEBUG_INT15("int15 AX=%04x\n",regs.u.
>        DX = regs.u.r16.dx;
>  
>  ASM_START
> -      sti
> -
>        ;; Get the count in eax
> -      mov  bx, sp
>        SEG SS
> -        mov  ax, _int15_function.CX [bx]
> +        mov  ax, .int15_function32.CX [bp]

Minor nit: You don't need SEG_SS if you're using bp, as bp defaults to
SS segment. 
>        shl  eax, #16
>        SEG SS
> -        mov  ax, _int15_function.DX [bx]
> +        mov  ax, .int15_function32.DX [bp]
As above.

--
Mats
>  
>        ;; convert to numbers of 15usec ticks
>        mov ebx, #15
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-staging mailing list
> Xen-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-staging
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>