| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Interrupt Affinity Question
On 14/4/07 09:06, "Pradeep Vincent" <pradeep.vincent@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to set dom0_vcpus_pin by default when dom0 is
> handling all the I/O. dom0 clearly should have high priority (weight)
> to avoid excessive I/O latency and hence none of the dom-0 vcpu would
> be left waiting in the runq for too long.
>
> Only problem would be relatively rare schedule-latency hit due to lack
> of ability to migrate but I am wondering if this would be better
> trade-off.
If you have a high I/O workload your best bet is probably to dedicate at
least one core to dom0, pin it there, and schedule all domU's onto the
remaining cores in the system.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home