| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformanc
 
| 
To:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance | 
 
| 
From:  | 
"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:38:50 +0800 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:43:58 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<C2255DB8.BD88%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5DE9DD8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<C2255DB8.BD88%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Mutt/1.5.11 | 
 
 
 
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:45:28AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 20/3/07 09:36, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The major problem this patch is trying to fix is the performance drop
> > when multiple HVM guests are running, and I think we need a better
> > solution for this.
> 
> >From my own reading of the code I would have thought that by removing that
> SSE memcmp we'd be replacing periodic SSE block memcmp with periodic
> pixel-by-pixel comparison (which is what I think we end up doing if we get
> past the SSE memcmp?). I'm thinking particularly of the VNC side of things
> rather than SDL here, by the way: you guys use SDL most of the time, right?
our developer prefer SDL, but our performance data shows that VNS also has such 
issue, although is a little better than SDL.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
-- 
best rgds,
edwin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for	performance, Zhai, Edwin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for	performance, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for	performance, Zhai, Edwin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Li, Xin B
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Li, Xin B
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Li, Xin B
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance,
Zhai, Edwin <=
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram	patchforperformance, Dong, Eddie
 
  
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch	forperformance, Christian Limpach
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram	patchforperformance, Dong, Eddie
 
  
 
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for	performance, Anthony Liguori
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for	performance, Anthony Liguori
 |  
  
 | 
    |