WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] smp booting query

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] smp booting query
From: "Pradeep Singh, TLS-Chennai" <pradeep_s@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:56:50 +0530
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:29:42 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdiTpgHtZck4bcvThaAwANuoSj7FA==
Thread-topic: smp booting query

hi all,

My query is related to xen-3.0.3.

1. Xen does not supports SMP booting , right?
   Is it true for both domU and dom0?

2. This means start_secondary from x86_32.S is never called by the hypervisor, am i right?
   the SECONDARY_CPU_FLAG denotes a non boot CPU here i guess?

3. If it is a secondary processor xen jumps to start_secondary.

4. __start_xen is called irrespective of the processor. right?

5. On doing a nm x86_32.o , we get -

         U __bss_start
00000057 t __start
         U __start_xen
         U _end
00000000 T _stext
00000000 B cpu0_stack
000001ac T gdt
000001aa t gdt_descr
00001000 T gdt_table
00000000 B idle_pg_table
00000000 B idle_pg_table_l2
000001a4 T idt
000001a2 t idt_descr
         U idt_table
00000170 t ignore_int
0000015c t int_msg
         U mmu_cr4_features
000001b2 t nopaging_gdt_descr
00000031 t not_multiboot
00000010 t not_multiboot_msg
         U printf
00000190 T stack_start
00000000 T start
00000108 t start_paging
         U start_secondary
00000000 T stext

nm shows that start_secondary is there still.Are we using it somehow ?

or am i missing something here?

Thanks in advance?




-----------------------
Pradeep Singh
Member Technical Staff
Core Technology Divison
53, Greams Road.
HCL Technologies, Chennai

DISCLAIMER:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. 
Any views or opinions presented in 
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of 
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any mail and 
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>