Re: [Xen-devel] page_alloc query

To:	Ben Thomas <bthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] page_alloc query
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:27:53 +0000
Delivery-date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:26:26 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<45EDE6D8.2040505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acdgkn/cvlptccyFEduL2AAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] page_alloc query
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214

On 6/3/07 22:10, "Ben Thomas" <bthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Why are the zones unsigned ints when they are used as indices ?
> The ASSERTS do checks to keep you out of some amount of
> trouble, but the loop appears to be able to get you quickly
> into trouble by driving the index negative and with a check
> that doesn't appear to be effective.

This is already fixed in the staging tree.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] page_alloc query