|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, docu
 
 Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 01/30/2007
10:32:40 AM: 
 
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:23:13AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: 
>  
> > Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 01/30/2007 10:12:10
AM: 
> >  
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger
wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > This patch aligns vTPM support in the Xen-API, documentation
and 
> > lib-xen 
> > > > (after the recent changes). 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > 
> > > What's the intention here?  You've removed the get_instance
calls, but 
> > not the 
> > > instance field from the documentation.  Assuming that
that's just a 
> > mistake, 
> > > and you meant to remove the instance field, we're left with
a VTPM class 
> > that 
> > > has nothing other than a reference to a VM and a reference
to a backend 
> > > domain.  What are the semantics of that object now? 
> >  
> > The instance will remain to be assigned by the hotplug scripts.
In the 
> > old-style of VM configuration file one could still pass it as
parameter, 
> > but its ignored. I rather not have it passed in as a parameter
by the 
> > Xen-API, either. From what I can see a getter for it is not useful, 
> > either, since I want the instance number to be hidden from management 
> > software. 
>  
> What we're left with seems like a pretty expensive way of saying "VTPM_backend 
> = N".  Is there really nothing else that's configurable?
 We could just put 
> this into VM.other_config if that's the only thing that you need,
which would 
> make configuring a VTPM a lot easier.
 
 I would like to treat the vTPM as a device like VIF
and VBDs with create and destroy methods exported to management software
so that a TPM device can be added to a VM similar to other devices and
possibly removed when the VM is not running.
 
   Stefan
  
>  
> Ewan. 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,	documentation and libxen, Stefan Berger
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,	documentation and libxen, Ewan Mellor
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, documentation and libxen, Stefan Berger
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,	documentation and libxen, Ewan Mellor
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, documentation and libxen,
Stefan Berger <=
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,	documentation and libxen, Ewan Mellor
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, documentation and libxen, Stefan Berger
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,	documentation and libxen, Ewan Mellor
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |