Re: [Xen-devel] Re: HVM smp guest save/restore support

To:	"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: HVM smp guest save/restore support
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:32:36 +0000
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:33:02 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070124133024.GC15711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acc/5gTdQ0yLUavZEduptAAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Re: HVM smp guest save/restore support
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 24/1/07 13:30, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> All hvm vcpu context restore should be done via the new hvm domctl, and the
>> wakeup of APs can be implemented there (rather than in common/ directory).
> 
> how about this patch?
> thanks,

This new piece of code is not VMX specific. Define an hvm_load_cpu_ctxt()
function which executes that new piece of code after calling the VMX/SVM
specific hook function. Also you shouldn't need to check if the vcpu is HVM,
as otherwise you wouldn't be in this function!

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: HVM smp guest save/restore support