 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/overrides.mk
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/overrides.mk |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:22:20 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:20:10 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
These config options set in $subject file seem to be used nowhere: CONFIG_VMX CONFIG_VMX_GUEST CONFIG_XEN_SHADOW_MODE CONFIG_XEN_SHADOW_TRANSLATE CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_GRANT XEN_EVTCHN_MASK_OPS CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_GRANT_RX CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_GRANT_TX What are they good for? And this option CONFIG_X86_XEN seems even dangerous, as it implies building for 32-bit x86. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] how to debug domain 0, Arhold |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] 32on64 fixes (was Re: [Xen-devel] unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/overrides.mk), Jan Beulich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
