 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:29:45 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:28:26 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Neither SVM nor VMX suppress CPUID[1].EDX.MC{E,A}, but there also is no
virtualization of the respective MSRs. Since the latter seems to have at best
marginal usefulness, shouldn't CPUID be respectively updated?
Thanks, Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/04] Kexec / Kdump: Release 20061122 (xen-unstable-12502), Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] netback crash with xen3.0.3, Kieran Mansley |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix the wrong order definition of ES/DS in regs structure of VMXAssist., Li, Xin B |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests, Petersson, Mats |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
