WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: consolidated xencomm

To: Tristan Gingold <tgingold@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: consolidated xencomm
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:52:57 -0600
Cc: xen-ppc-devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:53:16 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061116204420.GC2568@saphi>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center
References: <E1Gk8pJ-0007ef-Tr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1163692542.26011.14.camel@basalt> <1163700499.5529.9.camel@lappy> <20061116204420.GC2568@saphi>
Reply-to: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 21:44 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 09:55 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think I'm missing something. Why did IA64 fork xencomm?
> > > 
> > > I distinctly remember having conversations about sharing the code, which
> > > is obviously the right thing to do.
> > 
> >    Because Tristan believed the resulting amount of shared code would
> > actually be very small (1 file) and we wanted to get his work into the
> > tree before he left Bull.  We can still work to share as much as
> > possible even with the code split.  Thanks,
> Indeed.  Only asm/guest_access.h can be easily shared.  Feel free to do it.
>
> For the other files, sharing can't be easily done.  We have slightly changed
> the interface (we now have 3 ways: inline, mini and area).  Furthermore
> the translators are not very stable: bugs have been fixed recently.

Sharing can't easily be done *because* you've changed the interface, not
the other way around.

The patch I cited earlier today is a bug fix that applies to PowerPC as
well, but the code is not shared, and the patch did not fix both
architectures.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel