WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/

Home

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer

from [Markus Armbruster]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer
From:	Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:46:21 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:48:38 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200611161031.kAGAVxKK023149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Atsushi SAKAI's message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:31:10 +0900")
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<87odrfptrb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611160109.kAG19CiO003967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87velfhkdl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611161031.kAGAVxKK023149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi, Markus
>
> your code location of xenfb.h is in 
> linux-2.6.16.29-xen/include/xen/interface/io/xenfb.h
> it is wrong position.
>
> It should be located in 
> xen/include/public/io

If my patch were relative to the Xen source tree, you'd be right.  It
isn't.  There is no xen directory in a Linux source tree.

Yes, that means you can't apply my patch directly to your Xen source
tree.  Sorry about that.  I explained my reasons.

[...]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Gerd Hoffmann Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Steven Smith Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Atsushi SAKAI Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Atsushi SAKAI Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster <= [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Steven Smith Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Steven Smith Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Kasai Takanori Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Ewan Mellor

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Bug in HVM rtc emulation: wrongly placed return statement in rtc_ioport_write. Also comment on possible flaw in current io intercept logic., Trolle Selander
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] credit vs sedf scheduler, Emmanuel Ackaouy
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Atsushi SAKAI
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

This site is hosted by Citrix