Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_b

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/14/2006 03:08:05 PM: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:00:04PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > Return a string from vtpm_get_backend() function call. > > I thought this field was meant to be a reference to the VM that represented > the backend. Is that not the case?

When creating the vTPM I am passing in the backend paramter as the name of the VM rather than its reference (uuid). So I wanted to change this to be symmetric. Should the backend parameter rather be the reference to the VM and translated to the name internally?

Stefan
> > Ewan. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_backend() function call, Stefan Berger Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_backend() function call, Ewan Mellor Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_backend() function call, Stefan Berger <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_backend() function call, Ewan Mellor

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] supervisory_mode_kernel, Ky Srinivasan

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [LIBXEN] Fix returned type in vtpm_get_backend() function call, Ewan Mellor

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen-API] Destroy the state of a vTPM if a VM is destroyed, Stefan Berger

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]