| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel]Two dead-lock situation occurs on 32bit HVM SMP Windows
|
To: |
"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel]Two dead-lock situation occurs on 32bit HVM SMP Windows |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:37:11 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Susie" <susie.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, "He, Qing" <qing.he@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:37:27 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5D679212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AccAF9dKTIq91n6sSkWEGX/0OhiYJwAK0KTSAfN1PNAAAKU53Q== |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel]Two dead-lock situation occurs on 32bit HVM SMP Windows |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 14/11/06 17:33, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On x86_64 xen, we saw get_mfn_from_gpfn gets into the fault-and-fixup
> path frequently when running 64bit windows guests with 1G RAM, and quite
> a few of them are caused by gpfn > 0x100000, i.e. above 4G, so how about
> aslo adding a gpfn range check into get_mfn_from_gpfn? And we can use
> hvm_set_param to set the max gpfn # in xc_hvm_build.c.
Any idea what it's trying to access? Presumably nothing is mapped up there
so it just gets all-ones back from reads? I'm surprised it would be doing
lots of accesses to totally unused memory space. That tends to be fairly
slow even on native hardware.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home