|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] PV framebuffer
 
On 13/11/06 13:09, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We're waiting to hear from lanana before switching to xvc. I re-submitted
>> the allocation request two weeks ago (31st October). I haven't heard
>> anything yet. I suppose since static device nodes in /dev are rare these
>> days (since everyone moved to udev) we can just squat on some device number
>> for the time being, or settle for requesting a dynamic one at boot time and
>> require use of udev for anyone who cares about the device node. We already
>> settled for that with /dev/xen/evtchn, for example.
> 
> What do you want me to do here for the short term?  Drop the patch
> hunk and let you sort it out?
It doesn't seem to have much to do with the paravirt fb patch, so probably
it should be dropped.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |