WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make ballooning work with maxmem > mem (i386 ver

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make ballooning work with maxmem > mem (i386 version)
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:33:57 -0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:33:51 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C17A49E3.4537%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061110132407.GC32562@xxxxxxxxxx> <C17A49E3.4537%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:23:15PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 10/11/06 13:24, "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Trying to start a guest with maxmem > mem and then balloon up to a value
> > greater than mem is currently failing. This have been already discovered
> > (patch sent some days ago) for x86_64. i386 suffers from the same
> > problem.
> > 
> > This patch fixes it.
> 
> I took both patches and then changed my mind and immediately reverted them.
> There is a better way: we should support the XENMEM_memory_map hypercall.
> We should provide a hypercall (domctl) to set a memory_map_limit parameter
> and then Xen can use that to fake a memory map when XENMEM_memory_map is
> called. The tools can set that parameter from config['maxmem'].

And what happens when the hypercall ever returns ENOSYS, like a kernel
running in a bit old Hypervisor? 

IMHO,If we have to ever fallback into default assumptions, it seems wiser 
to extend the physicall map to maximum_reservation, not current_reservation. 

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
"Free as in Freedom"

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel