Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:57:44AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 10/11/06 08:45, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > - introduce guest_handle_add_offset_after_continuatiton() and
> >   replace guest_handle_add_offset() in memory.c with it.
> >   leave do_multicall() and guest_console_write() as is.
> 
> This is the best option I think. But I'm loathe to make it part of the
> guest_handle API. We should avoid getting into this mess in the first place
> for future hypercalls, so this will be a memory-specific function.
> 
> We should stick it at the top of memory.c, with a comment and make it a
> no-op dependent on something like ARCH_HAS_XENCOMM (or just __ia64__ ||
> __powerpc__ would be fine, actually, since it's just one place).

Here is the patch. Powerpc guys may have their own idea, though.
Unfortunately 4 #ifndef's are needed.

-- 
yamahata

12347_9c2edde14184_xencomm_and_xenmem_hypercall.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel