|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64
Ian Pratt write on 2006?10?30? 22:23:
>>> The data is dynamic, so I am afraid it is hard to store NVRAM data
>>> in domain config.
>>
>> There must be a possible static good configuration to allow
>> you to boot Oses you care about? Do changes happen during
>> guest execution that you really care about preserving across reboots?
Yes, static good configurations can be made for different guest OS (RHEL, SLES,
Win 2003, Win Vista). But I am afraid this workaround will have potential
issue, because we are unable to predict how guest OS would use variable.
>
> Further, storing it in a file will create compilcations when we move
> to running qemu in stub domains -- we'll need a way of passing it
> across xenbus.
Could you please elaborate what the "complications" is? Per my understanding,
even without NVRAM file, qemu in stub domain still need to read/write the disk
image file.
It is also OK to store NVRAM in xenstore, but seems xenstore have no capability
to store binary data, it can only store null-termincated strings. If we want
to directly store EFI variable in xenstore instead of sotre NVRAM binary, we
need to para-virtualize guest firmware GetVariable/Setvariable interface, which
is more complicated.
>
>
> Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64,
Yu, Ke <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]Nvram patch for IA64, Yu, Ke
|
|
|
|
|