Re: [Xen-devel] xen/stdarg.h patch

To:	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] xen/stdarg.h patch
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:28:50 +0100
Delivery-date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:29:25 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20061018182156.GA14774@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acby40GtgFVkrV7WEduNMwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] xen/stdarg.h patch
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 18/10/06 19:21, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I should have tested my suggestion. Unfortunately the standard stdarg.h
> on Solaris needs to include other files in /usr/include/. The current
> patch we have just uses gcc's stdarg.h in xen/include/xen/stdarg.h.
> Keir, would you take such a change?

#includes it, or includes it verbatim? The latter is a bit suspect, but I
suppose okay if it's obviously solaris-specific code. Is there no CFLAG
magic that can make <stdarg.h> work for you? My suspicion is that gcc
handles it a bit 'specially' when it runs on Linux.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen/stdarg.h patch