| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] [RFC][PATCH] Isolating ACM's architecture-depen
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:53 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> hollisb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/13/2006 10:51:29 AM:
> >
> > Other than that, this patch seems great.
>
> Don't want to have that checked in so far, though.
Why not?
BTW, I missed this first time:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ root/xen-unstable.hg/xen/acm/acm_multiboot.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +#include <acm/acm_hooks.h>
That is where the (non-inline) ACM/multiboot functions should live; not
in a header file.
> What about the multiboot code. Do you think PPC will be able to also
> use this part? Not that I would move it, it's more out of curiosity.
Well, that ifdef will need changing. Why must it exist at all, is it
some weirdness of Xen/x86-64?
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home