On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:28:25PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:11:11PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > That is only on the 'failsafe' stackframe path. It is okay to write zero
> > values there because we already wrote the real values lower down on the
> > stack frame (at labels FLT7 to FLT10). In fact you probably shouldn't end up
> > taking the 'failsafe' path anyway, so the code you remove wouldn't normally
> > be executed at all unless something in the guest is buggy.
> Yep, saw that. So I have to recheck that.
It works correctly with the patch but not without. Can't say why.
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
Description: Digital signature
Xen-devel mailing list