Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [UNTESTED] Fix sentinel in call to execlp in tools/iommu/vnc.c

[Harry Butterworth <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The following code in vnc.c needs to change.  I'm not sure if the patch
below is the way to change it or if it should be changed in
tools/ioemu/patches/vnc-start-vncviewer or in both places.

Why is the code checked in in two places?

It's trivial, please commit a fix or explain exactly what is required
and I'll re-spin the patch.

Harry.

On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 17:31 +0100, Harry Butterworth wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:58 -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > August 30, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
> > 
> > changeset:   11288:a47951e59cbf
> 
> > ISSUES:
> > 
> > x86_64 **BLOCKED (SLES 10 on IBM HS20 Blade 8843)
> > 
> > Unable to start xen on this machine. Build log shows:
> > 
> > /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/ioemu/vnc.c:1272: 
> > warning: missing sentinel in function call
> > make[3]: *** [vnc.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** [subdir-i386-dm] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [ioemu] Error 2
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > ...
> > make[3]: *** [vnc.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** [subdir-i386-dm] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [ioemuinstall] Error 2
> > make: *** [install] Error 2"
> 
> This patch should fix your problem here.  I have not tested it.  Please
> give it a go and report whether it is OK to be committed to the tree.
> 
> The issue is that 0 on a 64 bit machine is a 32 bit integer whereas the
> sentinel needs to be a 64 bit null pointer for the code to be correct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harry Butterworth <butterwo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel