 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] pointers in public headers
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] pointers in public headers |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:05:34 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:05:35 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there any reason to retain some instances of uses of pointers in the public headers? I would have expected that only guest handles should be used there. Thanks for clarification, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XenPPC] RFC: xencomm - linux side, Tristan Gingold |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 machine_to_phys vs NX bit, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [Patch][RFC] fix xc_ptrace_core for gdbserver-xen on x86_64., Akio Takebe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] pointers in public headers, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
