| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: RFC: xencomm in common
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:15:41 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: iso-8859-1, 34 lines --]
>
> Le Lundi 21 Août 2006 11:41, Keir Fraser a écrit :
>> On 21/8/06 10:20 am, "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Fine in principle. Specific comments:
>> >> * powerpc should be cleaned up at the same time to use the common
>> >> infrastructure. I don't want duplicated code hanging around in
>> >> arch/powerpc
>> >
>> > I have attached a blindly-made patch again powerpc files.
>> > If ppc people could check this, I'd be happy.
>> >
>> >> * The code you add to common/ should obey the coding style of other
>> >> files in that directory
>> >> * Arguably we should have an asm-generic for the xencomm guest-access
>> >> macros. That's a Linux-ism which I think fits well in this particular
>> >> case.
>> >
>> > Taken into account in this updated patch.
>>
>> Looks better. I assume you'll resend with signed-off-by when you want these
>> applied.
> Hi,
>
> here are the signed-off-by patches for xen.
> I took the liberty to add Hollis Blanchard in signed-off-by of the first
> patch
> because he is the primary author of these files.
I suspect that CC is better than Signed-Off in this case.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home