WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86 bitops adjustment

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86 bitops adjustment
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:57:38 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:57:37 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(partly in preparation for initial PAE-guest-on-64bit patches)
For constant_test_bit(), since the bitfield is split into 'unsigned int'-s,
also only used an unsigned literal one for shifting (should produce
slightly smaller code on x86-64).
For variable_test_bit(), the 'const' modifier was missing from the
bitfield parameter - the 'variable' in the name is regarding the 'nr'
parameter, not the bitfield.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: bitops.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86 bitops adjustment, Jan Beulich <=