Re: [Xen-devel] is_initial_xendomain()

["Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, here's the patch, leaving just a single occurrence of 
CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST.
(Testing was done on 2.6.18-rc4, and I hope there's nothing wrong with the 
patch as adapted
to 2.6.16.13).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 18.08.06 10:57 >>>



On 18/8/06 8:56 am, "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>> #define is_initial_xendomain() (xen_start_info->flags &
> SIF_INITDOMAIN)
>> #else
>> #define is_initial_xendomain() 0
>> #endif
>> 
>> If that is acceptable, I'm ready to create a respective patch
>> (but I'd like to avoid spending time on it if there are objections).
> 
> Personally, I'd like to see CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST disappear
> altogether. The code size saving is small, and most people use the -xen
> kernel rather than  -xen0/-xenU anyway.

A partial cull based on initial_xendomain() would be a good first step.
We'll certainly take the patch if you make one, Jan.

 -- Keir

xenlinux-cond-is-initdom.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel